Senator Vitter calls Rachel Maddow a dude

 

Diaper boy Sen. David Vitter (R-LA), the Republican Senator of Louisiana who made headlines a while back for his hot diaper sex fetish, who just can't seem to keep catch a break, is finding himself in more doo doo (good thing for the diaper) after jostling on a radio show about how Rachel Maddow looks like a dude based upon her High School yearbook photo. 

Okay, so perhaps her choice in eyeglasses make her look like Harry Potter or a mathemagician at a dorky kid's B-day party. But MSNBC is fairly certain that Rachel Maddow, much like her liberal counterpart Keith Olbermann, is a lady.

Here's the word-for-word transcript from David Vitter's appearance on the morning radio show:

 
MALE HOST: I wonder if Senator Vitter is ever going to post, like, maybe the video of the first time he was on the floor of the Senate. If I have to show the way I looked the first time I was on TV, you should do that too.

VITTER: We should go further back than that, how about high school yearbook?

MALE HOST: Oh yeah.

VITTER: De La Salle marching band.

MALE HOST: That'd be cool. Well you know, with Rachel Maddow they had that picture of her...

FEMALE HOST: Looking like a woman.

MALE HOST: Yeah it was really bizarre.

VITTER: [LAUGHS]: Must have been a long time ago.

ALL THREE: [HEAVY LAUGHTER]

 What better way to resurrect a fledgling re-election campaign by mocking your enemy's high school year book photo. I imagine the voters of Louisiana are much more concerned about a lesbian liberal commentator's high school features than their economic livelihoods following the BP rig disaster. 

Naturally, the Vitter campaign went into damage control, which is really the only type of control when you're working for David Vitter. 

Here's the apology letter released by the Vitter Campaign:

 

Dear Rachel,

Regarding my remark during a radio conversation today, I apologize.
The hosts made their comment and I obviously chimed in. While we do not usually agree on the issues, I do not think you deserved that comment.

Sincerely,
David

One can only assume that David realized that Rachel is a woman and can potentially let him defecate in a diaper at a mutually agreed upon price.

Mel Gibson's Passion of the N-Word

Occasional actor/director and full-time cartoonish lunatic Mel Gibson officially ended any chances of bringing us Passion of the Christ 2 after a philippic tirade was caught on audio tape, which includes such Hallmark gems as wishing that Oksana Grigorieva, the mother of his infant daughter, be "raped by a pack of niggers" as well as screaming about her wearing "tight pants so you can see your fucking pussy."

 

"You're an embarrassment to me. You look like a f***ing pig in heat, and if you get raped by a pack of n***ers, it will be your fault."

"How dare you act like such a bitch when I have been so f**king nice."

"I am going to come and burn the f**king house down... but you will blow me first ."

Oh Mel, every angry ex has been there before. But it's widely known that the arson/blow job invitation almost always should precede the irrational string of violent calumnies and racial slurs. That's not to say that Mel Gibson isn't the only person in Hollywood to use the N word, there are many known studio executives, directors, producers, actors who use the word willy-nilly. And we certainly cannot leave out all of those refined  rappers. But I'm fairly certain that none of these individuals have solidified their rants with the arson/blow job invitation. That's just tacky and in poor taste. 

Mad Mel's horrendous rant certainly displays a massive amount of rage and aggression, but considering that this was supposedly a private conversation harangue I hardly see why the world should be spared another misplaced Buddy Film. It seems that Talent Agency WME just dropped Mel over his liberal usage of the N-word. Nevermind the steady stream of feminist rhetoric he so eloquently shared with Oksana, as rich white guilt Hollywood Liberals would rather feign sensitivity and concern for race over misogyny. 

  The only good thing that can come from this is the hope that The NY Times runs this story and imagining its stuffy, uptight editors quibble ad nauseam over the proper usage of the word pussy.