Diaper boy Sen. David Vitter (R-LA), the Republican Senator of Louisiana who made headlines a while back for his hot diaper sex fetish, who just can't seem to keep catch a break, is finding himself in more doo doo (good thing for the diaper) after jostling on a radio show about how Rachel Maddow looks like a dude based upon her High School yearbook photo.
Okay, so perhaps her choice in eyeglasses make her look like Harry Potter or a mathemagician at a dorky kid's B-day party. But MSNBC is fairly certain that Rachel Maddow, much like her liberal counterpart Keith Olbermann, is a lady.
Here's the word-for-word transcript from David Vitter's appearance on the morning radio show:
MALE HOST: I wonder if Senator Vitter is ever going to post, like, maybe the video of the first time he was on the floor of the Senate. If I have to show the way I looked the first time I was on TV, you should do that too.
VITTER: We should go further back than that, how about high school yearbook?
MALE HOST: Oh yeah.
VITTER: De La Salle marching band.
MALE HOST: That'd be cool. Well you know, with Rachel Maddow they had that picture of her...
FEMALE HOST: Looking like a woman.
MALE HOST: Yeah it was really bizarre.
VITTER: [LAUGHS]: Must have been a long time ago.
ALL THREE: [HEAVY LAUGHTER]
What better way to resurrect a fledgling re-election campaign by mocking your enemy's high school year book photo. I imagine the voters of Louisiana are much more concerned about a lesbian liberal commentator's high school features than their economic livelihoods following the BP rig disaster.
Naturally, the Vitter campaign went into damage control, which is really the only type of control when you're working for David Vitter.
Here's the apology letter released by the Vitter Campaign:
One can only assume that David realized that Rachel is a woman and can potentially let him defecate in a diaper at a mutually agreed upon price.
Dear Rachel,
Regarding my remark during a radio conversation today, I apologize.
The hosts made their comment and I obviously chimed in. While we do not usually agree on the issues, I do not think you deserved that comment.
Sincerely,
David
No comments:
Post a Comment